Am Sonntag, 13. Juni 2010 16:28:37 schrieb Vadym Chepkov:
> On Jun 13, 2010, at 10:18 AM, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 13. Juni 2010 15:07:36 schrieb Vadym Chepkov:
> > (...)
> >
> >> The whole point of my posting was: it does not get the same IP, not sure
> >> how you missed it. If you took a look into
> >> /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/heartbeat/IPaddr2, you would see
> >>
> >> case "$OCF_RESKEY_unique_clone_address" in
> >>  true|TRUE|True|yes|YES|Yes|1)
> >>    prefix=`echo $OCF_RESKEY_ip | awk -F. '{print $1"."$2"."$3}'`
> >>    suffix=`echo $OCF_RESKEY_ip | awk -F. '{print $4}'`
> >>    suffix=`expr ${OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_clone:-0} + $suffix`
> >>    OCF_RESKEY_ip="$prefix.$suffix"
> >>    ;;
> >>  *) ;;
> >> esac
> >>
> >> And again, my posting clearly showed configured ip 10.10.10.22 versus
> >> assigned - 10.10.10.23.
> >
> > I see.
> >
> > What happens if you remove the  unique_clone_address attribute or set it
> > to false?
>
> then, of cause,  it will be the same everywhere and iptables rules need to
> be applied.
>
> > Indeed it should not use the CLUSTERIP target if
> > unique_clone_address="true" and create instead a set of consecutive IP
> > addresses in the nodes. I did not know about this feature.
> >
> > If it does not work, it seems to be a bug.
>
> It doesn't

http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker

-- 
Dr. Michael Schwartzkopff
MultiNET Services GmbH
Addresse: Bretonischer Ring 7; 85630 Grasbrunn; Germany
Tel: +49 - 89 - 45 69 11 0
Fax: +49 - 89 - 45 69 11 21
mob: +49 - 174 - 343 28 75

mail: mi...@multinet.de
web: www.multinet.de

Sitz der Gesellschaft: 85630 Grasbrunn
Registergericht: Amtsgericht München HRB 114375
Geschäftsführer: Günter Jurgeneit, Hubert Martens

---

PGP Fingerprint: F919 3919 FF12 ED5A 2801 DEA6 AA77 57A4 EDD8 979B
Skype: misch42
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to