Hi,

On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 05:52:36PM -0400, Peter Sylvester wrote:
> I do have to agree.  I've actually been working for almost 4 business days
> now on trying to get Heartbeat and Pacemaker working together and have ran
> into tons of issues.  Unfortunatly since this is for a client it's not
> really something I have an option on and I plan on plugging away a little
> bit further tonight.  Should I make any progress in the near future I plan
> on writing up some docs that may help others that are trying to get this
> implemented.
> I have confidence that, ones implemented, the process will work well.  It's
> come recommended from several sources including consultants on the MySQL
> team.  Hopefully I can get this up and running soon!  If I was to make a
> recommendation for the development team I would say to try and make this
> more user friendly, especially for those of use that are working on servers
> with no GUI.

I don't use GUI and I'm all ears how to make it more friendly. In
particular with the crm shell.

Thanks,

Dejan

>  - Peter
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 5:44 PM, David Lang
> <[email protected]>wrote:
> 
> > > haresources2cib.py is obsolete and probably produces a bad
> > > cib.xml. The recommended way is to create a configuration using
> > > the crm shell.
> >
> > Ok, so this means that there is officially no migration path for those of
> > us
> > using a V1 sty;e config
> >
> > This is really starting to sound like we need to fork heartbeat back to the
> > 2.x or thereabouts when it could work for simple things easily.
> >
> > does anyone have a good handle on where we should start and what bugs have
> > been
> > fixed since then (as opposed to new features added, components split out,
> > etc)?
> >
> >
> > I've been watching things get more and more complicated over time, and I
> > recognise that to solve complex problems you sometimes need that
> > complexity, but
> > there are a LOT of problems that aren't that complex. Heartbeat has been
> > making
> > it harder and harder to do simple things, and with the difficulty in
> > figuring
> > out what version 3.0.2 is doing that Igor is experiancing, and the
> > inability to
> > take a simple config and convert it to the new format, it is sounding like
> > it
> > may be time to fork.
> >
> > David Lang
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-HA mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to