On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 07:53:25AM -0500, [email protected] wrote: > On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:00:29AM -0500, [email protected] wrote: > >> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:52:38PM -0500, [email protected] wrote: > >>>> I have two older desktop pcs that I have set up with drbd, corosync and > >>>> pacemaker > >>>> No problems there > >>>> My hat is off to y'all > >>>> Great software > >>>> I have set up the colocation rules so that all apps run on one machine > >>>> or the other > >>>> If I break the communication link between them I get split-brain > >>>> So I figure stonith suicide is my only option > >>> > >>> suicide is not an option at all. You need a proper fencing > >>> device. And you need redundant communication links. > >>> > >> > >> I have no say in the matter > >> That is what I was given to work with > >> I think suicide is better that nothing at all > >> I am just having a bit of trouble getting it to work properly > > > > No wonder. suicide cannot work for split-brain. Think about it. > > > > Think about it > Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm > Got nothing
:) There is split-brain. Nodes can't talk to each other anymore. How does a node shoot the other one using suicide? > Since I only have the 2 pcs and there is not a chance of > getting more equipment What might you suggest Explain the management/client all the possible consequences of running a (two-node) cluster without fencing. Then get a fencing device. That stuff is really not so expensive anymore. Thanks, Dejan > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
