Hi, On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 09:26:40PM +0200, Jonathan Petersson wrote: > Hi all, > > I haven't been active on this list for quite some time but I recall > conntrack-support for heartbeat/pacemaker has been on the wall a few > times. As I was in the process of installing a couple of new firewalls > I figured I would spend some time actually getting some support for it > now that the resource-based system has been put in place (great work > btw). > > Please notice that the code-set is still work in progress and I'll be > spending the next few days expanding it.
Any new developments in the meantime? > The code is available at: http://pastebin.com/Bv060JvR > > Feel free to reply with comments and recommended changes. Isn't conntrack supposed to be a master-slave implementation, i.e. where one instance sends updates to other instances? I don't know if migrate can be used instead of demote/promote. A note about the style and comments: Almost everywhere there's stuff such as # Check for conntrackd lock-file if [ -f $OCF_RESKEY_lck ]; then There's no need to write a comment which echos what the code says in the next line. Cheers, Dejan > /Jonathan > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
