On Tuesday 28 September 2010 11:13:47 Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 06:27:17AM +0200, Michael Schhwartzkopff wrote:
> > On Thursday 23 September 2010 13:47:43 Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 09:26:40PM +0200, Jonathan Petersson wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > > 
> > > > I haven't been active on this list for quite some time but I recall
> > > > conntrack-support for heartbeat/pacemaker has been on the wall a few
> > > > times. As I was in the process of installing a couple of new
> > > > firewalls I figured I would spend some time actually getting some
> > > > support for it now that the resource-based system has been put in
> > > > place (great work btw).
> > > > 
> > > > Please notice that the code-set is still work in progress and I'll be
> > > > spending the next few days expanding it.
> > > 
> > > Any new developments in the meantime?
> > > 
> > > > The code is available at: http://pastebin.com/Bv060JvR
> > > > 
> > > > Feel free to reply with comments and recommended changes.
> > > 
> > > Isn't conntrack supposed to be a master-slave implementation,
> > > i.e. where one instance sends updates to other instances? I don't
> > > know if migrate can be used instead of demote/promote.
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > A MS RA for conntrackd is not nescessary. conntrack publishes its state
> > table via multicast. You start it on all nodes of your firewall cluster
> > as a clone resource. The firewall that has the floating IP address sees
> > new entries in the state table and published it. All other nodes get the
> > new entries.
> 
> So, you could just as well let conntrack start by the boot
> process, right? I always wondered on the relative merit of
> cloning such resources or starting them via init.

Monitoring via the cluster. An reaction when the resource doesn't run any 
more.


-- 
Dr. Michael Schwartzkopff
Guardinistr. 63
81375 München

Tel: (0163) 172 50 98
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to