On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 08:13 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > > Um, maybe because heartbeat v1 has a much much much much less steep > > learning curve? > > I dispute that: > > > http://theclusterguy.clusterlabs.org/post/178680309/configuring-heartbeat-v1-was-so-simple
This addresses the fact that Pacemaker has many features that heartbeat v1 lacks. That is not in dispute, but it completely sidesteps the point that heartbeat v1 is sufficient for many uses and much easier to get working. I have not said that heartbeat v1 is "better" than pacemaker, only that it is easier to get working. The question was asked "why would anyone want to use heartbeat v1". Here is one valid answer to that question. This point has been made on this list before by myself and others, and yet the question "why would anyone want to use heartbeat v1" continues to be asked. I understand that nobody has any interest in developing heartbeat v1 any more. I accept this, I have moved on to v3 and Pacemaker. But that does not invalidate the answer to the original question. --Greg _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
