> But don't let me stop you from using corosync, you still > can build your particular cluster with the same amount > of hardware.
The only thing that would stop me from using corosync is the thought that it is somehow unreliable or "not there yet," scary as that sounds. The cluster would be serving up mission critical data and I don't like the less than confident feeling I'm starting to get when people talk about corosync's redundant rings. I do have a few heartbeat haresources-based clusters and one corosync+pacemaker cluster already in production. The thought of yet another mix is less than attractive. > (no need for cross-over cables on gigabit ethernets, by > the way) Yeah, I use the word because its meaning is more or less clear and it has fewer letters than point-to-point, back-to-back, or direct Ethernet. -- Eric Robinson Disclaimer - October 24, 2010 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for General Linux-HA mailing list. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and might not represent those of Physicians' Managed Care or Physician Select Management. Warning: Although Physicians' Managed Care or Physician Select Management has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachments. This disclaimer was added by Policy Patrol: http://www.policypatrol.com/ _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
