On 24 October 2010 22:09, Robinson, Eric <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> But now could someone please elaborate on Dejan Muhamedagic's > original > >> comment that started the thread? What does "redundant rings are still > > >> not there" mean? Is a three-node cluster an unreliable setup because > >> Corosync and/or Pacemaker are not really ready for that? > >> > > >not Pacemaker - Corosync. I agree with Dejan. I also use Heartbeat for > clusters communication layer. > > So you use Heartbeat+Pacemaker instead of Corosync+Pacemaker? How does > Heartbeat handle 3-node clusters? Does it use the same "ring" metaphor > and switches for cluster communication? > > I have a 3-node cluster with heartbeat and works fine. Here is my ha.cf to get an idea r...@node-01 ~]# cat /etc/ha.d/ha.cf autojoin none use_logd on debug 0 mcast eth0 239.0.0.43 694 1 0 bcast eth1 warntime 5 deadtime 15 initdead 60 keepalive 2 node node-01 node node-02 node node-03 crm respawn apiauth stonith-ng uid=root As you can see there is nothing special for building 3-node cluster. Cheers, Pavlos _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
