Am Sonntag 31 Oktober 2010, 18:24:15 schrieb Jan: > Hi All, > > just testing the external/sbd stonith agent and I get somehow confused. > > The SBD device is on the shared storage, and this is where the poison pill > is offered. What if a failure occurs and one node (or more) cannot access > it? No poison pill can be offered. My guess is that I need to setup: > > - a primitive resource for each node (this can be a clone) > - the primitive should be the first resource of the group where other > resources managing data are running. This would protect access to the > storage, similarly to sfex. > > Another recommendation could be to create the SBD device on the same shared > data storage (another LUN) and of course, use another STONITH device (PDU > or similar) > > Is the scenario drafted correct? > > Thanks, > Jan > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
Hi Jan, I think all your questions should be answered here: http://www.linux-ha.org/SBD_Fencing Best regards, Martin -- I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty, than those attending too small a degree of it. _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
