On 11/01/2010 07:40 PM, Martin Jedamzik wrote: Am Sonntag 31 Oktober 2010, 18:24:15 schrieb Jan:
Hi All, just testing the external/sbd stonith agent and I get somehow confused. The SBD device is on the shared storage, and this is where the poison pill is offered. What if a failure occurs and one node (or more) cannot access it? No poison pill can be offered. My guess is that I need to setup: - a primitive resource for each node (this can be a clone) - the primitive should be the first resource of the group where other resources managing data are running. This would protect access to the storage, similarly to sfex. Another recommendation could be to create the SBD device on the same shared data storage (another LUN) and of course, use another STONITH device (PDU or similar) Is the scenario drafted correct? Thanks, Jan _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems Hi Jan, I think all your questions should be answered here: http://www.linux-ha.org/SBD_Fencing Best regards, Martin Hi, I could make the watchdog works and now I see the answers to my scenario. Anyway, I still don't see how should be configured the STONITH resource in the CIB. One primitive not cloned is enough? Thanks, Jan _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
