On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Mia Lueng <[email protected]> wrote:
> And since hbtest02 is fenced , why does hbtest01 not take over the resource?

http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1/html/Clusters_from_Scratch/ch05s03.html#id637389

>
>
> 2010/12/1 Dimitri Maziuk <[email protected]>
>
>> Mia Lueng wrote:
>>
>> > Are there any network tiebreaker configuration to determinate which node
>> > should be fenced in this two-node cluster split-brain suitaion? In my
>> case,
>> > since all nic links of hbtest02 is unpluged, the resource should be taken
>> > over by the one with healthy net link.
>>
>> You do realize that since the node is not connected to any network, you
>> don't actually care if it has a split brain or not?
>>
>> With an even number of nodes you may not have quorum. With two nodes you
>> can't have quorum.
>>
>> Dima
>> --
>> Dimitri Maziuk
>> Programmer/sysadmin
>> BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-HA mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to