Il giorno Mar 22 Mar 2011 10:32:10 CET, Christoph Bartoschek ha scritto: [...] > The linbit.com document "Highly available NFS storage with DRBD and > Pacemaker" suggests to use the lsb:nfs-kernel-server resource while the > wiki suggests ocf:heartbeat:nfsserver. > Which one is the better one and what are the advantages? > Christoph
exportfs must not be used with nfsserver: they make the same things in two different ways. The first manages the exports on an already active nfs server, the second manages the nfs process (and here you must have a shared /var/lib/nfs between nodes). So the choice is yours. I personally prefer exportfs because is a little bit simple and all you have to do is configure the primitive. There is also another one big thing that exportfs have and nfsserver not: suppose you want to create a cluster nfs server in which every node shares an export: this is very simple with exportfs, but basically impossible with nfsserver (unless you split you configuration, your nfs daemon and so on). Have a nice day. -- RaSca Mia Mamma Usa Linux: Niente รจ impossibile da capire, se lo spieghi bene! [email protected] http://www.miamammausalinux.org _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
