I basically had the same question as Christopher :) Thanks for the great clarification RaSca!
I'll go for exportfs and lsb:nfs-kernel-server for sure. Kind regards, Caspar Smit 2011/3/22 RaSca <[email protected]> > Il giorno Mar 22 Mar 2011 10:32:10 CET, Christoph Bartoschek ha scritto: > [...] > > The linbit.com document "Highly available NFS storage with DRBD and > > Pacemaker" suggests to use the lsb:nfs-kernel-server resource while the > > wiki suggests ocf:heartbeat:nfsserver. > > Which one is the better one and what are the advantages? > > Christoph > > exportfs must not be used with nfsserver: they make the same things in > two different ways. The first manages the exports on an already active > nfs server, the second manages the nfs process (and here you must have a > shared /var/lib/nfs between nodes). > So the choice is yours. > I personally prefer exportfs because is a little bit simple and all you > have to do is configure the primitive. There is also another one big > thing that exportfs have and nfsserver not: suppose you want to create a > cluster nfs server in which every node shares an export: this is very > simple with exportfs, but basically impossible with nfsserver (unless > you split you configuration, your nfs daemon and so on). > > Have a nice day. > > -- > RaSca > Mia Mamma Usa Linux: Niente รจ impossibile da capire, se lo spieghi bene! > [email protected] > http://www.miamammausalinux.org > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
