>>> Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]> schrieb am 18.05.2011 um 16:47 in Nachricht <20110518144724.GA3661@squib>: > Hi, > > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 09:03:29AM +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote: > > >>> Lars Marowsky-Bree <[email protected]> schrieb am 17.05.2011 um 22:39 in > > >>> Nachricht > > <[email protected]>: > > > On 2011-05-17T17:16:51, Ulrich Windl <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I think that pacemaker is logging too much all the time, so you hardly > can > > > find out if there really is a problem. For example external/sbd is > > > logging > a > > > message every time the shared disk is OK, that is every 30s or so. > > > > > > It should not - the external/sbd status code path doesn't have any log > > > messages? What do you see? > > > > Apr 28 17:10:11 host2 stonith: [7890]: info: external/sbd device OK. > > Apr 28 17:10:42 host2 stonith: [7951]: info: external/sbd device OK. > > Apr 28 17:11:13 host2 stonith: [8007]: info: external/sbd device OK. > > Apr 28 17:11:44 host2 stonith: [8063]: info: external/sbd device OK. > > This happens because the plugin is invoked via stonith(8) (the > program) and stonith does the logging. I did notice that before, > but didn't remove the message because the best practice for > monitoring fencing devices is to do that every once in a while > (say every few hours).
Hi! So this is a "success" message for a monitor operation? Why not using the primitive name (instead of the RA name) and a different wording like "info: monitoring primitive reported success"? Regards, Ulrich _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
