On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 05:06:25PM +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote: > >>> Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]> schrieb am 18.05.2011 um 16:47 in > Nachricht <20110518144724.GA3661@squib>: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 09:03:29AM +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote: > > > >>> Lars Marowsky-Bree <[email protected]> schrieb am 17.05.2011 um 22:39 in > > > >>> Nachricht > > > <[email protected]>: > > > > On 2011-05-17T17:16:51, Ulrich Windl > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I think that pacemaker is logging too much all the time, so you > > > > > hardly > > can > > > > find out if there really is a problem. For example external/sbd is > > > > logging > > a > > > > message every time the shared disk is OK, that is every 30s or so. > > > > > > > > It should not - the external/sbd status code path doesn't have any log > > > > messages? What do you see? > > > > > > Apr 28 17:10:11 host2 stonith: [7890]: info: external/sbd device OK. > > > Apr 28 17:10:42 host2 stonith: [7951]: info: external/sbd device OK. > > > Apr 28 17:11:13 host2 stonith: [8007]: info: external/sbd device OK. > > > Apr 28 17:11:44 host2 stonith: [8063]: info: external/sbd device OK. > > > > This happens because the plugin is invoked via stonith(8) (the > > program) and stonith does the logging. I did notice that before, > > but didn't remove the message because the best practice for > > monitoring fencing devices is to do that every once in a while > > (say every few hours). > > Hi! > > So this is a "success" message for a monitor operation?
To be more precise, for the stonith status operation. > Why not > using the primitive name (instead of the RA name) and a Unfortunately, the stonith program doesn't know the primitive name, probably because it doesn't need to know it. > different wording like "info: monitoring primitive reported > success"? Well, we could do that, though the current wording seems unequivocal to me too. The stonith(8) program, when created, was just an auxiliary program and never part of a running cluster. Now it got rather abruptly into that role and it shows here and there that its use was interactive. Thanks, Dejan > Regards, > Ulrich > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
