Hi Many thanks for this status. I suppose this is the same status on RHEL6 as Suse is likely to be "in advance" with regard to RHEL6 Pacemaker & corosync evolutions ?
Alain De : Lars Marowsky-Bree <[email protected]> A : General Linux-HA mailing list <[email protected]> Date : 23/05/2011 13:10 Objet : Re: [Linux-HA] Status about the four stack options Envoyé par : [email protected] On 2011-05-23T10:49:16, [email protected] wrote: > Hi > > I just wonder the status of the 4 stack options : > from which releases of Pacemaker & corosync are the 3 and 4 options > available ? > and on which Distribution ? RHEL6 ? > > 1. corosync + pacemaker plugin (v0) This is what SUSE Linux Enterprise High-Availability Extension uses, and is fully supported. > 2. corosync + pacemaker plugin (v1) + mcp We may switch to this at a later time during the SLE HA cycle. > 3. corosync + cpg + cman + mcp > 4. corosync + cpg + quorumd + mcp On SLE, we're bound to skip 3, but 4) is probably somewhere in the very late future, once it is fully stabilized and integrated. Regards, Lars -- Architect Storage/HA, OPS Engineering, Novell, Inc. SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) "Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
