On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 9:54 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi
> Many thanks for this status. I suppose this is the same status on RHEL6 as
> Suse is
> likely to be "in advance" with regard to RHEL6 Pacemaker & corosync
> evolutions ?

This is not implied.

On RHEL6, although Pacemaker is not officially supported yet, people
are encouraged to use option 2 or 3 due to the improved
startup/shutdown reliability.

I'd imagine option 4 is about a year or so away.

>
> Alain
>
>
>
> De :    Lars Marowsky-Bree <[email protected]>
> A :     General Linux-HA mailing list <[email protected]>
> Date :  23/05/2011 13:10
> Objet : Re: [Linux-HA] Status about the four stack options
> Envoyé par :    [email protected]
>
>
>
> On 2011-05-23T10:49:16, [email protected] wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I just wonder the status of the 4 stack options :
>> from which releases of Pacemaker & corosync are the 3 and 4 options
>> available ?
>> and on which Distribution ? RHEL6 ?
>>
>> 1.      corosync + pacemaker plugin (v0)
>
> This is what SUSE Linux Enterprise High-Availability Extension uses, and
> is fully supported.
>
>> 2.      corosync + pacemaker plugin (v1) + mcp
>
> We may switch to this at a later time during the SLE HA cycle.
>
>> 3.      corosync + cpg + cman + mcp
>> 4.      corosync + cpg + quorumd + mcp
>
> On SLE, we're bound to skip 3, but 4) is probably somewhere in the very
> late future, once it is fully stabilized and integrated.
>
>
> Regards,
>    Lars
>
> --
> Architect Storage/HA, OPS Engineering, Novell, Inc.
> SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix
> Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
> "Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to