On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:05 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Yan,
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Thank you for comment.
>
>> Hi Hideo,
>>
>> On 08/04/11 08:13, [email protected] wrote:
>> > Hi Yan,
>> >
>> >> Pushed. Since we don't have a separate branch, you might need to
>> >> back-port this patch to pacemaker-mgmt-2.0.0, which is compatible with
>> >> pacemaker-1.0.x
>> >
>> > Thanks!!
>> >
>> > However, we need the release of pacemaker-mgmt for Pacemaker1.0.
>> >
>> > Is it impossible you apply a patch to a repository of 
>> > pacemaker-mgmt-2.0.0, and to release?
>> Probably we'll need to ask Andrew to help move pacemaker-mgmt to git
>> later. Then we can create a separate branch/repo for pacemaker-mgmt-2.0
>> which would be keeping compatible with pacemaker-1.0
>
> To Andrew: Please please lend the hand to us.

I can create a place for it on clusterlabs.org or github if thats
where Yan would like it to live, but the conversion itself it for the
project owner to do (and verify)  ;-)

>
>>
>> BTW, pacemaker-1.1 has been merged with devel repo. The tip of
>> pacemaker-mgmt can be built against pacemaker-1.1 now.
>
> Many Thanks!!
>
> Hideo Yamauchi.
>
>>
>> Regards,
>>   Gaoyan
>> --
>> Gao,Yan <[email protected]>
>> Software Engineer
>> China Server Team, SUSE.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-HA mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to