On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Andreas Mock <[email protected]> wrote: > See below... > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Andrew Beekhof >> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 6:59 AM >> To: General Linux-HA mailing list >> Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] Install problems with ha resource >> > I don't think it's mandated by the spec, at least it doesn't say >> > so :) >> >> Actually the spec says '/usr/ocf/resource.d': >> >> >> https://github.com/ClusterLabs/OCF-spec/blob/master/ra/resource-agent-api.txt#L132 >> >> I guess some packaging guideline got it pushed into lib and the spec >> wasn't updated. >> At any rate, it is not intended to be admin/user/builder configurable. > > Funny argumentation: > - Today the default OCF_ROOT path is not as stated in the spec. > - Someone changed it to a different path in real packaging. > RedHat and SuSE are selling products based on that. Why does > it not matter? Because it works. > - The reason for that change is not known at the moment > - Let's change the spec to reflect the reality > - BUT: Don't change the spec to allow relocation of OCF_ROOT when > there are meaningful arguments for doing so.
Its not funny at all. The last point is based on the amount of subtle breakage that is likely to occur since everything was written for a fixed value of /usr/lib/ocf I'm also yet to come across any "meaningful arguments for doing so" either. > > ;-) > > Best regards > Andreas Mock > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
