Hi, On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:33:27AM +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote: > Hi! > > As nobody answered (FAIR), I'm replying to my own message: As it turned out, > there's a comment somewhere in the LRM sources that states "this part isn't > implemented yet".
Where? > Once it is implemented (maybe even before), the CRM shell could benefit from > a "crm resource reload .." (currently there's only a "restart" available). Hmm, not sure what does LRM has to do with the reload. It's just another operation. Thanks, Dejan > Regards, > Ulrich > > > >>> Ulrich Windl schrieb am 02.12.2011 um 10:17 in Nachricht <4ED89791.99F : > >>> 161 : > 60728>: > > Hi! > > > > After the preceeding discussion about the "reload" action I added a > > "reload" > > to my RA. > > Now I have another problem: Assume the configuration > > > > group G A B > > > > Both A, and B are the same RA that support reload. If I change the > > configuration of A, CRM stops B first, the reloads A, then starts B again. > > > > This makes me wonder what the reasoning for "reload" is at all. In normal > > cases, a reload avoids a restart of a resource. So if A isn't restartet, > > why > > is B then? > > > > I was hoping: if A can be reloaded, B can stay up. > > > > Regards, > > Ulrich > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
