>>> Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]> schrieb am 13.12.2011 um 17:02 in
Nachricht <20111213160251.GF3568@squib>:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:33:27AM +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> > Hi!
> > 
> > As nobody answered (FAIR), I'm replying to my own message: As it turned 
> out, there's a comment somewhere in the LRM sources that states "this part 
> isn't implemented yet".
> 
> Where?

pengine/allocate.c:306-328 (I guess)

> 
> > Once it is implemented (maybe even before), the CRM shell could benefit 
> from a "crm resource reload .." (currently there's only a "restart" 
> available).
> 
> Hmm, not sure what does LRM has to do with the reload. It's just
> another operation.

Jes, "another" operation probably means "not the same as restart". As said 
earlier,

when reloading one resource, a dependent resource is restarted, even if it can 
be reloaded. Meaning: A "reload" means the resource is still up during reload, 
thus no restarts or reloads of dependent resources should be necessary. Things 
like that.

Regards,
Ulrich



> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dejan
> 
> > Regards,
> > Ulrich
> > 
> > 
> > >>> Ulrich Windl schrieb am 02.12.2011 um 10:17 in Nachricht <4ED89791.99F 
> > >>> : 
> 161 :
> > 60728>:
> > > Hi!
> > > 
> > > After the preceeding discussion about the "reload" action I added a 
> "reload" 
> > > to my RA.
> > > Now I have another problem: Assume the configuration
> > > 
> > > group G A B
> > > 
> > > Both A, and B are the same RA that support reload. If I change the 
> > > configuration of A, CRM stops B first, the reloads A, then starts B again.
> > > 
> > > This makes me wonder what the reasoning for "reload" is at all. In normal 
> > > cases, a reload avoids a restart of a resource. So if A isn't restartet, 
> why 
> > > is B then?
> > > 
> > > I was hoping: if A can be reloaded, B can stay up.
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > Ulrich
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-HA mailing list
> > [email protected] 
> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha 
> > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected] 
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha 
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems 
> 

 
 

_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to