On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Jonathan Schaeffer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm designing a cluster with N nodes plugged to a SAN device. > > There will be no shared storage on the cluster.
That seems like a contradiction. Please explain. > I wanted to know if it is good practice (or common enough) to build a > filesystem containing configuration data for the clustered services. That's entirely possible, and people typically use NFS mounts for that purpose. > I'm thinking of having a special mount point for samba or sldapd > configuration data. This storage device would be mounted on the same > host that run the services. In case of failure, the mountpoint moves > along with the services. This way I only have one configuration point to > maintain. Like I said, why not use NFS, possibly combined with cluster-managed symlinks? Cheers, Florian -- Need help with High Availability? http://www.hastexo.com/now _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
