Le 08/02/2012 16:03, David Gersic a écrit : >>>> On 2/8/2012 at 03:18 AM, Florian Haas <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Jonathan Schaeffer >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm designing a cluster with N nodes plugged to a SAN device. >>> >>> There will be no shared storage on the cluster. >> >> That seems like a contradiction. Please explain. > > I think the OP means that there won't be any service using shared storage > (ie: service runs on node1 and node2 simultaneously sharing one database on > disk). The SAN, of course, provides shared storage to the nodes. At least > that's how I read it. Yes this is what I meant.
>>> I wanted to know if it is good practice (or common enough) to build a >>> filesystem containing configuration data for the clustered services. >> >> That's entirely possible, and people typically use NFS mounts for that >> purpose. > > ocf:Filesystem resources mount and unmount SAN based file systems nicely. > Works for iSCSI too. I haven't used NFS, so far, though I don't see how it > would be any different, really, since it's just mount / umount. Yes, it works without any problem. It's technically feasable and it seems that people do it like that. thanks for the feedbacks. jonathan -- IUEM - Service Informatique rue Dumont D'Urville Technopôle Brest-Iroise 29280 Plouzané France tel: +33 2 98 49 87 94
0xA8657ED2.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
