On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenb...@linbit.com> wrote: >> order o_nfs_before_vz 0: cl_fs_nfs cl_vz >> order o_vz_before_ve992 0: cl_vz ve992 > > a score of "0" is roughly equivalent to > "if you happen do plan to do both operations > in the same transition, would you please consider > to do them in this order, pretty please, if you see fit"
Lars beat me to this, as the post turned out to be a little more elaborate than expected, but here's a bit of background info for additional clarification: http://www.hastexo.com/resources/hints-and-kinks/mandatory-and-advisory-ordering-pacemaker >> This is on / with: >> * Debian 6.0.4 >> * corosync 1.4.2 (from Debian backports) >> * pacemaker 1.0.9.1 (from Debian backports) squeeze-backports is on 1.1.6, and you _really_ want to upgrade. Cheers, Florian -- Need help with High Availability? http://www.hastexo.com/now _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
