Hi Ulrich, On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Ulrich Windl <ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote: > Hi! > > http://www.hastexo.com/resources/hints-and-kinks/mandatory-and-advisory-ordering-pacemaker > > I have a comment on the article: If you specify that foo should be started > before bar, does that imply that the stop ordering will be reversed > automatically, i.e. if foo failes, will bar be stopped before foo is started, > or will foo be started, even if bar is already up?
As for "if foo fails, will bar be stopped before foo is started" -- the article already answers exactly that. That however has nothing to do with automatic reversal on stop. Which is good input to get; I'll add that. > Maybe the article should also talk abou the modifiers like "foo:Started" that > aren't really well specified anywhere I've looked ;-) We try to keep the Hints & Kinks short and sweet, and deliberately don't delve into all the side topics for a particular issue. That being said, adding a separate one about how role/op specification affect colo and order constraints is an excellent suggestion. Thanks for that. If you have followup questions on any of the Hints & Kinks, btw: feel free to use the in-page comments for that; the comment field should be enabled on all of them. If you find any where it isn't, please shoot me an email off-list and we'll promptly correct that. Thanks! Cheers, Florian -- Need help with High Availability? http://www.hastexo.com/now _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
