On 06/18/2012 03:04 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> Hi again,
> 
> could you tell me the package which install the "pacemaker plugin v1" and 
> which
> is the name of the binary or binaries or src ?

You only need to add:

service {
        # Load the Pacemaker Cluster Resource Manager
        ver:       1
        name:      pacemaker
}

to your corosync.conf ... or create a file with this content in
/etc/corosync/service.d/.

Once you started Corosync you need to start the pacemaker init script,
that starts the MCP ... and stop that services in reverse order.

The init script is part of the pacemaker package on RHEL 6.x

Regards,
Andreas

-- 
Need help with Pacemaker?
http://www.hastexo.com/now


> 
> Thanks a lot
> Alain
> 
> 
> 
> De :    Andrew Beekhof <[email protected]>
> A :     General Linux-HA mailing list <[email protected]>
> Date :  16/06/2012 12:25
> Objet : Re: [Linux-HA] Pacemaker/corosync ==> Pacemaker/cman (on RH 6.2)
> Envoyé par :    [email protected]
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:06 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi Andrew
>>
>> you recall me in an old thread here that effectively cman was not 
> involved
>>
>> in option 4 : corosync + cpg + quorumd + mcp
>> whereas it is involved in option 3 : corosync + cpg + cman + mcp
>> but is seems that corosync is also used in both options .
> 
> cman is just a corosync plugin.  think of "cman" being an alias for
> "corosync + cman plugin"
> 
>>
>> I tried to configure option 3 as you've seen in my other email two days
>> ago, and we
>> only have a mini cluster.conf file , and no more corosync.conf (and it
>> works once
>> I start Pacemaker after cman ;-) )
>>
>> My question is now :
>> when the option 4 will be available, we will come back to the
>> corosync.conf file  ?
> 
> yes
> 
>> as same as with option 2 and no more cluster.conf  ?
> 
> right
> 
>> And to be completely clear on why my question :
>> the temporary option 3 forces us to use a mini cluster.conf, and 
> therefore
>> only one heartbeat network (or two but with bonding).
> 
> I'm pretty sure you can have redundant rings with cluster.conf, I just
> don't know the details.
> 
>> But if in the future we configure option 4, and come back to
>> corosync.conf, we will be able to have again two networks rings in
>> the corosync.conf, and so ... that sounds be much better for me.
>> Excpet if quorumd is working with a mini cluster.conf like cman ?
> 
> No. Just corosync.conf
> You can get a preview of how option 4 works here:
>   
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/zd1mi6u1m7ac5t9/Pacemaker-1.1-Clusters_from_Scratch-en-US.pdf
> 
> 
> I need to finish it off and push to clusterlabs...
> 
>>
>> Thanks for these precisions.
>> Regards
>> Alain
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-HA mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
> 





Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to