On 06/19/2012 09:22 AM, [email protected] wrote: > Hi > > Sorry but I don't know what iirc means , I suppose iirc in this context > stands for "plugin". > If so, how can I check for sure that the plugin is or is not in the > pacemaker package ? > (it is to check the pacemaker package delivered with the new RH 6.3)
Check the pacemaker package if it contains the "/etc/init.d/pacemaker" init script, that start the MCP ... if yes, then adopt your corosync.conf as I wrote in my previous mail. Regards, Andreas -- Need help with Pacemaker? http://www.hastexo.com/now > > Thanks > Alain > > > > De : Andrew Beekhof <[email protected]> > A : General Linux-HA mailing list <[email protected]> > Date : 18/06/2012 23:38 > Objet : Re: [Linux-HA] Pacemaker/corosync ==> Pacemaker/cman (on RH 6.2) > Envoyé par : [email protected] > > > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 11:04 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi again, >> >> could you tell me the package which install the "pacemaker plugin v1" > and >> which >> is the name of the binary or binaries or src ? > > its the pacemaker source rpm. it doesn't ship by default iirc > >> >> Thanks a lot >> Alain >> >> >> >> De : Andrew Beekhof <[email protected]> >> A : General Linux-HA mailing list <[email protected]> >> Date : 16/06/2012 12:25 >> Objet : Re: [Linux-HA] Pacemaker/corosync ==> Pacemaker/cman (on RH 6.2) >> Envoyé par : [email protected] >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:06 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi Andrew >>> >>> you recall me in an old thread here that effectively cman was not >> involved >>> >>> in option 4 : corosync + cpg + quorumd + mcp >>> whereas it is involved in option 3 : corosync + cpg + cman + mcp >>> but is seems that corosync is also used in both options . >> >> cman is just a corosync plugin. think of "cman" being an alias for >> "corosync + cman plugin" >> >>> >>> I tried to configure option 3 as you've seen in my other email two days >>> ago, and we >>> only have a mini cluster.conf file , and no more corosync.conf (and it >>> works once >>> I start Pacemaker after cman ;-) ) >>> >>> My question is now : >>> when the option 4 will be available, we will come back to the >>> corosync.conf file ? >> >> yes >> >>> as same as with option 2 and no more cluster.conf ? >> >> right >> >>> And to be completely clear on why my question : >>> the temporary option 3 forces us to use a mini cluster.conf, and >> therefore >>> only one heartbeat network (or two but with bonding). >> >> I'm pretty sure you can have redundant rings with cluster.conf, I just >> don't know the details. >> >>> But if in the future we configure option 4, and come back to >>> corosync.conf, we will be able to have again two networks rings in >>> the corosync.conf, and so ... that sounds be much better for me. >>> Excpet if quorumd is working with a mini cluster.conf like cman ? >> >> No. Just corosync.conf >> You can get a preview of how option 4 works here: >> >> > https://www.dropbox.com/s/zd1mi6u1m7ac5t9/Pacemaker-1.1-Clusters_from_Scratch-en-US.pdf > >> >> >> I need to finish it off and push to clusterlabs... >> >>> >>> Thanks for these precisions. >>> Regards >>> Alain >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Linux-HA mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >> _______________________________________________ >> Linux-HA mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Linux-HA mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
