On 10/21/2012 09:11 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 3:30 AM, Dimitri Maziuk <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 10/19/2012 03:33 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Thanachit Wichianchai
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Hello Linux-HA community,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Current Setup:
>>>>
>>>> Linux HA Version: 2.1.4
>>>
>>> Seriously?
>>> Stop now and upgrade to something more recent.  I beg you.
>>
>> RHEL 5 will be in production phase until 2017.
> 
> And how exactly does this affect Heartbeat which has never shipped on
> any version of RHEL?

It's in EPEL. Arguably, if you're locked into RHEL 5 by a support
contract of some sort you probably can't be installing EPEL packages
either -- but 2.1.4 is what 'yum install heartbeat' gets you if you have
EPEL enabled.

>> Get used to it already.
> 
> No.
> 
> Due to various factors, the quality of those early releases was awful
> and they are now known to be packed full of logical and conceptual
> bugs.

That may be, but 2.1.4 has been perfectly stable for me in haresources
mode so far. If and when it blows up I'll perhaps start caring.

Point being, the correct answer to OP's question was not "seriously?",
it was "if you *have* to use 2.1.4, run it with 'crm off', if you don't,
then upgrade".

-- 
Dimitri Maziuk
Programmer/sysadmin
BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to