On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:44 AM, Dimitri Maziuk <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/21/2012 09:11 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 3:30 AM, Dimitri Maziuk <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> On 10/19/2012 03:33 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>>> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Thanachit Wichianchai >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Hello Linux-HA community, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Current Setup: >>>>> >>>>> Linux HA Version: 2.1.4 >>>> >>>> Seriously? >>>> Stop now and upgrade to something more recent. I beg you. >>> >>> RHEL 5 will be in production phase until 2017. >> >> And how exactly does this affect Heartbeat which has never shipped on >> any version of RHEL? > > It's in EPEL. Arguably, if you're locked into RHEL 5 by a support > contract of some sort you probably can't be installing EPEL packages > either -- but 2.1.4 is what 'yum install heartbeat' gets you if you have > EPEL enabled.
Only if you explicitly add the EPEL repos in the first place. I would contend that if you're adding a repo for clustering, it might make sense to add one for which you'll actually get some support. > >>> Get used to it already. >> >> No. >> >> Due to various factors, the quality of those early releases was awful >> and they are now known to be packed full of logical and conceptual >> bugs. > > That may be, but 2.1.4 has been perfectly stable for me in haresources > mode so far. If and when it blows up I'll perhaps start caring. I'm happy you have something that works for you. Although even if you're using it in haresources mode, your resource agents are still years out of date. > Point being, the correct answer to OP's question was not "seriously?", > it was "if you *have* to use 2.1.4, run it with 'crm off', if you don't, > then upgrade". No-one *has* to run 2.1.4. Like you they might choose to, but that is not the same thing. In this case, Thanachit had gone to the effort of crafting the necessary XML config by hand, so he'd already chosen not to use haresources. _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
