On 2012-11-07T12:51:25, Ulrich Windl <[email protected]> wrote:
> I agree that one shouldn't have to do it, but I've seen cases (two node
> cluster with quorum-policy=ignore) where one node was down while the
> "cluster" wanted to fence both nodes. So when the other node goes up, nodes
> will shoot each other.
> My expectation was that the "cluster" would see that the other node is down
> and hasn't to be shot. Likewise it looks stupid if the remaining node insists
> of being shot, but refuses to shoot itself.
Well, it doesn't see that the "other node" is down, it has to make sure
by shooting it. But the surviving node wanting to shoot itself shouldn't
happen (unless you then have something like a stop failure there, too).
Was this reported?
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB
21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
