>>> Lars Marowsky-Bree <[email protected]> schrieb am 08.11.2012 um 09:07 in >>> Nachricht <[email protected]>: > On 2012-11-07T12:51:25, Ulrich Windl <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I agree that one shouldn't have to do it, but I've seen cases (two node > cluster with quorum-policy=ignore) where one node was down while the > "cluster" > wanted to fence both nodes. So when the other node goes up, nodes will shoot > each other. > > My expectation was that the "cluster" would see that the other node is down > and hasn't to be shot. Likewise it looks stupid if the remaining node insists > of being shot, but refuses to shoot itself. > > Well, it doesn't see that the "other node" is down, it has to make sure > by shooting it. But the surviving node wanting to shoot itself shouldn't > happen (unless you then have something like a stop failure there, too). > > Was this reported?
Hi Lars, no, because I wasn't there when the situation developed; I was just called when the situation was there already. Despite of that we'll move to SLES11 SP2 ASAP. Regards, Ulrich > > > Regards, > Lars _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
