Am Dienstag, 8. Januar 2013, 15:43:25 schrieb Andreas Mock: > Hi together, > > a question concerning corosync communications. > > What would you recommend: Redundant rings over > several seperate ethernet connections or using bonding > of several ethernet devices to get redundancy? > (Putting one ring ontop of the bonding device) > > Where can I read about the current state of ring > autorecovery in corosync? > > Best regards > Andreas Mock
I'd prefer bonding. But beware, there are many pitfals in bonding. You have to choose the right mode test failure detection really good. I had a hard time with several interfaces not playing well with bonding (mii, ...). Perhaps you end up in configuring two separate rings again. state of a ring: corosync-cfgtool -s -- Dr. Michael Schwartzkopff Guardinistr. 63 81375 München Tel: (0163) 172 50 98 _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
