On 2013-01-08T10:03:20, Digimer <[email protected]> wrote:
> If you use two separate networks for RRP, and each network sits on top
> of a mode=1 bond, then you will have the highest redundancy. I do this
> with stacked switches where each leg of the bond is in a different
> switch, so I can survive total switch failures as well as individual
> link losses.
This does not work for things that use the DLM (OCFS2/GFS2), since SCTP
is a notorious PITA.
I still think a mode=3 bond for corosync should be even better, but the
rest of the system probably wouldn't appreciate the duplicated packets
;-)
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB
21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
