On 02/19/2013 10:58 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Bernd Schubert
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 02/19/2013 06:53 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Bruce Ford <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Lukas,
>>>>
>>>> thanks for the quick reply.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Lukas Grossar
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> On 15.02.2013 16:43, Bruce Ford wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm running pacemaker 1.1.7 on RedHat 6.3 using the fence_ipmilan
>>>>>> fence agent from the "fence-agents" 3.1.5 package.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I found that although I have chosen the action "off", this doesn't
>>>>>> power off the target node but reboots it with a graceful shutdown. So
>>>>>> I investigated on the commandline:
>>>>>
>>>>> I ran into the same problem when setting up a cluster using CentOS 6.3
>>>>> and sent a mail to the mailing list about a week ago and got the
>>>>> following reaction from Andrew Beekhof:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Prior to 6.4 there was some inconsistency between the various agents
>>>>>> and whether they supported "action" or "option".
>>>>>> An upgrade to 6.4 in the next few weeks should solve this for you.
>>>>
>>>> Does 6.4 mean RedHat/Centos 6.4? What a pity, this is currently not an 
>>>> option.
>>>> Will we face serious problems trying to backport the new fence-agents 
>>>> package?
>>>
>>> No, should be pretty straightforward
>>
>> So that will introduce another serious change of behaviour in RHEL 6.4?
>
> No. All agents now support "action".  Anything that used to support
> "option" will continue to do so.

Hmm, I'm still not sure if I understand it correctly. So with 6.4 one 
has to set (in crm syntax):

property stonith-action="reboot"
?

Right now we have:

property stonith-action="poweroff"

and the fence_ipmilan option: action=off


And that leads to a reboot, as it is supposed to do for this 
installation. I definitely remember that my colleague who did this 
installation had some trouble to get fence_ipmilan to do what we 
intended to do.


Thanks,
Bernd
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to