On 20.02.2013 09:28, Bernd Schubert wrote: > On 02/19/2013 10:58 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Bernd Schubert >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 02/19/2013 06:53 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>>> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Bruce Ford <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Lukas, >>>>> >>>>> thanks for the quick reply. >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Lukas Grossar >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> On 15.02.2013 16:43, Bruce Ford wrote: >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm running pacemaker 1.1.7 on RedHat 6.3 using the fence_ipmilan >>>>>>> fence agent from the "fence-agents" 3.1.5 package. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I found that although I have chosen the action "off", this doesn't >>>>>>> power off the target node but reboots it with a graceful shutdown. So >>>>>>> I investigated on the commandline: >>>>>> >>>>>> I ran into the same problem when setting up a cluster using CentOS 6.3 >>>>>> and sent a mail to the mailing list about a week ago and got the >>>>>> following reaction from Andrew Beekhof: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Prior to 6.4 there was some inconsistency between the various agents >>>>>>> and whether they supported "action" or "option". >>>>>>> An upgrade to 6.4 in the next few weeks should solve this for you. >>>>> >>>>> Does 6.4 mean RedHat/Centos 6.4? What a pity, this is currently not an >>>>> option. >>>>> Will we face serious problems trying to backport the new fence-agents >>>>> package? >>>> >>>> No, should be pretty straightforward >>> >>> So that will introduce another serious change of behaviour in RHEL 6.4? >> >> No. All agents now support "action". Anything that used to support >> "option" will continue to do so. > > Hmm, I'm still not sure if I understand it correctly. So with 6.4 one > has to set (in crm syntax): > > property stonith-action="reboot" > ? > > Right now we have: > > property stonith-action="poweroff" > > and the fence_ipmilan option: action=off > > And that leads to a reboot, as it is supposed to do for this > installation.
That may be what it is supposed to do for this installation, but it is not what it is supposed to do according to the documentation/man page. > I definitely remember that my colleague who did this > installation had some trouble to get fence_ipmilan to do what we > intended to do. > > > Thanks, > Bernd
0xF4F014C4.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
