>>> Lars Marowsky-Bree <[email protected]> schrieb am 18.04.2013 um 10:45 in >>> Nachricht <[email protected]>: > On 2013-04-18T09:49:17, Ulrich Windl <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > It would be nice if sbd had a built-in restart/upgrade mechanism. > > Yes. Feel free to send a patch ;-)
I had seen the sources once: I wouldn't patch; I'd rewrite it. The coding style is just terrible (e.g. no systematic error checking). > > > I guess it wouldn't be too hard to update parameters while sbd is > running... > > > > So is it possible with sbd? If not, why? ;-) > > Because it wasn't implemented yet. It is not quite so easy, because > there's a timing window (during which a fence may not be handled > properly), some values need to be cluster-wide synced at once, and the > question how to handle a failing restart. > > > Regards, > Lars _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
