Hi!

Just because I'd like to know: Why aren't you running a 50-node cluster (or
larger-than-2-nodes clusters)?

Regards,
Ulrich

>>> John M <[email protected]> schrieb am 09.07.2013 um 16:36 in Nachricht
<CACNodvbjzDLzPJzuf96ycnNku=TxgzBck0s_LSNACJVSHAZ7=a...@mail.gmail.com>:
> Hi All,
> 
> Finally I have installed pacemaker-1.1.8 and corosync 1.4.1 (On RHEL 5.8)
> 
> I have around 50 servers running a custom master slave application.
> That is 25 number of 2 node clusters.
> 
> Now I want to know
> 1. Can I use a node which is part of another cluster to run quorum node?
> 2. Can I configure a standalone quorum node that can manager 25 Clusters?
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> BR,
> Mark
> 
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Ulrich Windl <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> >>> John M <[email protected]> schrieb am 13.06.2013 um 21:52 in
>> Nachricht
>> <cacnodvzhri8cthvxo4lbagwjgxwytjjrsuvb9yi-anyh9p+...@mail.gmail.com>:
>> > Heartbeat is not restarting the failed process. In my
>> > configuration default-resource-failure-stickiness is set to -INFINITY
>>
>> ??? Zero is absolutely sufficient; what are you trying to accieve?
>>
>> > and resource_failure_stickiness is set to -INFINITY at resource level.
>>
>> (again)
>>
>> > If a Master resource fails, slave becomes Master and If a Slave resource
>> > fails, status becomes "stopped".In both the case failed resources stays
>> as
>> > it is.
>>
>> Logs, maybe...
>>
>> > BR,
>> > Mark
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Ulrich Windl <
>> > [email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> >>> John M <[email protected]> schrieb am 12.06.2013 um 18:49 in
>> >> Nachricht
>> >> <CACNodvYynv=isiGmuswbNqgVmCusM--6w0yC03eCbCG=kyh...@mail.gmail.com>:
>> >> > Dear All,
>> >> >
>> >> >   I will try to setup pacemaker cluster in the coming weeks. Before
>> that
>> >> I
>> >> > have to complete the configuration using heartbeat 2.1.4.
>> >> >   I would really appreciate if you could suggest the configuration
for
>> >> > Master/Slave scenario mentioned in my previous mail.
>> >>
>> >> Doesn't look very complicated for a two-node scenario:
>> >> ms cln_test prm_test \
>> >>         meta clone-max="2" globally-unique="false" notify="true"
>> >> clone-node-max="1" master-node-max="1" master-max="1"
>> >>
>> >> What is your problem?
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Ulrich
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >   Thanks in advance.
>> >> >
>> >> > BR,
>> >> > Mark
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tuesday, June 11, 2013, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >> On 2013-06-11T15:05:11, John M <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>>     Unfortunately I cannot install pacemaker :(
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>     I just installed heartbeat 2.1.4 and in crm_mon I am getting
>> >> >>> Master/Slave status.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You seriously need to upgrade. Heartbeat 2.1.4 is ages old and has
>> many,
>> >> >> many known bugs. You'll not be able to secure community aid for that
>> >> >> version any more.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Regards,
>> >> >>     Lars
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Architect Storage/HA
>> >> >> SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix
>> >> > Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
>> >> >> "Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar
>> >> Wilde
>> >> >>
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> Linux-HA mailing list
>> >> >> [email protected] 
>> >> >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha 
>> >> >> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems 
>> >> >>
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > Linux-HA mailing list
>> >> > [email protected] 
>> >> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha 
>> >> > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems 
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Linux-HA mailing list
>> >> [email protected] 
>> >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha 
>> >> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems 
>> >>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Linux-HA mailing list
>> > [email protected] 
>> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha 
>> > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems 
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-HA mailing list
>> [email protected] 
>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha 
>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems 
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected] 
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha 
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems 


_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to