----- Original Message ----- > From: "Digimer" <[email protected]> > To: "General Linux-HA mailing list" <[email protected]> > Cc: "David Vossel" <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 5:21:00 PM > Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] establishing a new resource-agent package provider > > On 29/07/13 18:19, David Vossel wrote: > > hey, > > > > Historically the ocf resource agents have been shipped under the > > 'heartbeat' provider alias. Now that pacemaker exists, the legacy name > > "heartbeat" is slightly confusing since it refers to another project. We > > should change this. > > > > How would you all feel about moving all the 'heartbeat' provider agents > > into a new provider called 'core', and then for legacy purposes create a > > 'heartbeat' symlink that points to the 'core' directory so no one's > > configuration breaks... Eventually some day we could move in the direction > > of depreciating the use of the 'heartbeat' provider entirely. > > > > good plan? any thoughts? > > > > -- Vossel > > How does this compare to the Red Hat fence/resource-agent packages? I'm > very happy to see "heartbeat" and it's inherent confusion go away, so I > am fundamentally for this. I only question "core" and how it will relate > to those fence and resource agents.
"core" would only be related to the ocf standard. I don't think this should have any relation to the fence agents. -- Vossel > > -- > Digimer > Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ > What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without > access to education? > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
