On 29/07/13 19:20, David Vossel wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Digimer" <[email protected]>
To: "General Linux-HA mailing list" <[email protected]>
Cc: "David Vossel" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 5:21:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] establishing a new resource-agent package provider
On 29/07/13 18:19, David Vossel wrote:
hey,
Historically the ocf resource agents have been shipped under the
'heartbeat' provider alias. Now that pacemaker exists, the legacy name
"heartbeat" is slightly confusing since it refers to another project. We
should change this.
How would you all feel about moving all the 'heartbeat' provider agents
into a new provider called 'core', and then for legacy purposes create a
'heartbeat' symlink that points to the 'core' directory so no one's
configuration breaks... Eventually some day we could move in the direction
of depreciating the use of the 'heartbeat' provider entirely.
good plan? any thoughts?
-- Vossel
How does this compare to the Red Hat fence/resource-agent packages? I'm
very happy to see "heartbeat" and it's inherent confusion go away, so I
am fundamentally for this. I only question "core" and how it will relate
to those fence and resource agents.
"core" would only be related to the ocf standard. I don't think this should
have any relation to the fence agents.
-- Vossel
Ok, then my concerns are not. No objection here then.
--
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without
access to education?
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
