Lars Marowsky-Bree <[email protected]> writes: > On 2013-09-17T11:38:34, Ferenc Wagner <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On the other hand, doesn't the recover action after a monitor failure >> consist of a stop action on the original host before the new start, just >> to make sure? Or maybe I'm confusing things... > > Yes, it would - but it seems there's a brief period during reboot where > the guest is shown as gone/cleanly stopped, and then the "stop" action > will just see the very same. > > Actually that strikes me as a problem with Xen/libvirt's reporting.
Absolutely. KVM under libvirt does not exhibit such behaviour on our systems, and I find this most natural and correct. -- Regards, Feri. _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
