The XL tools are much faster and lighter weight. I am not sure if they
report proper codes (I will have to test) but the XM stack has been
deprecated so at some point I assume it will go away completely.
[LIVE] qaxen1:~ # time xl list
Name ID Mem VCPUs State
Time(s)
Domain-0 0 25347 12 r-----
146383.6
Domain list removed
real 0m0.053s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m0.008s
[LIVE] qaxen1:~ # time xm
list
Name ID Mem VCPUs State
Time(s)
Domain-0 0 25347 12 r-----
146381.1
Domain list removed
real 0m0.352s
user 0m0.236s
sys 0m0.036s
On 11/15/2013 02:04 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>>>> Tom Parker <[email protected]> schrieb am 14.11.2013 um 19:23 in Nachricht
> <[email protected]>:
>> Hello.
>>
>> Now that XM has been deprecated is anyone working on a Xen RA that uses
>> the xl tool stack?
> I woonder whether xl will (opposed to xm) report proper exit codes if
> operations fail. Otherwise I don't see the reason to change tools. MHO...
>
>> I am willing to do the work but I don't want to duplicate the effort if
>> someone else is doing/has already done it.
>>
>> Tom
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-HA mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
