On 29 Mar 99 at 13:36, Karl F. Larsen wrote:
> Assuming PSK is phase shift keying and C/N ratios is Signal to Noise ratio
> and FSK means Frequency Shift Keying, the words above make no sense at
> all.
I have understood that my explanation does not make your bell ring.
> My MFJ uses PSK for pactor.
Unless MFJ has a new protocol, the old pactor protocol from SCS was
meant for FSK 200 Hz shift.
> The pctII talks to my pactor so it must use PSK too. What is the
> point here?
NO. The PTC uses either FSK or PSK as needed. RTTY, AMTOR and Pactor
are FSK modes.
> Jose, a deal: I will publish the protocal in total for pactor and
> you publish the protocal used by ptcII in total and then we will let the
> smart people on this list decide just how much better/worse ptcII is.
It is on the PTC-II manual. It is available on the SCS Web page. I
wouldn't like to clutter the list with this stuff and need asbestos
underwear later on.
> If you can't do what you need to do, then stop telling us that
> ptcII works better than pactor. I and many others do not believe you.
Why should I stop telling the truth ? For me, on this, period. Stop.
NNNN
Jose, CO2JA
PS: Wouldn't I be flamed if I publish something that is available
elsewhere and is not strictly Linux ?
---
Ing. Jose A. Amador | Telf: (537) 20-7814
Depto de Telecomunicaciones | E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ISPJAE |
