Re: ax25_subr.c, fix for ~ included in .../linux-2.0.36/net/ax25

[Tomi Manninen]

On Thu, 14 Jan 1999, Matthias Welwarsky wrote:

> Hopefully ;-) We may still have a talk about the interface. kiss is fine
> to just get the data out of the kernel, however, the new code assumes
> that the driver supplies information about PTT and DCD state. Impossible
> with KISS, 6PACK via pty may be a solution, but 6PACK is much harder to
> implement on the driver side then kiss - I know that, I wrote the 6PACK
> driver for the TNC2 ;-)
> 
> For sure you can go on with kiss and implement channel access on your
> own, but then the kernel won't be able to optimize the channel access
> strategy.

How about the BPQKISS extensions? They give you an ACK after the frame is
really sent. Could that be in any way usefull? 

-- 
--... Tomi Manninen / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / OH2BNS @ OH2RBI.FIN.EU ...--