>I know nothing about PACTOR other than that all the units I've seen
>for it are expensive, so can't comment thereon...

For a point to point link of 150km (93 miles) I the VHF(prefered band) or 
UHF would be cheaper and give better through put. I know a point to point 
link using JNOS and FTP to transfer data can do 80 BYTES/SECOND. Pactor 
is less than 300 baud I think. 

We have several repeaters in the area between 500 and 1km (1500 to 3000 
ft) that can work 50 watt moble stations at 80km(50 miles) With a decent 
antenna at both ends and a node in the middle it seems very resonable to 
cover 150k on vhf. Solar power would be expensive but if you can get 
enough contributions.. maybe even some from the goverment it would 
provide a lot of benifit in the long run. Theft of the solar panels would 
be a big concern of course. 

In the states comercial traffic on the ham bands is prohibited. You would 
want to stay within the laws in your country. If that was a problem the 
same pricipals outlined above would also work if you had to use 
commercial freqs.


Mike Duvall
ac4zq

Reply via email to