We experimented with 9600 baud about two years ago. We used Tekk radios that
were specifically set up for 9600 baud, and when they are close together,
they work well. But if you try to use radios not originally designed for
9600, you must modify the inputs to remove any audio filtering or the
signals will be degraded.
73 de Jim
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------
-.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.. . -.- .. --... .- -.-- -.- -.
Jim Darrough - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Advanced Class Amateur Radio Operator KI7AY
Linux Enthusiast
http://eugene-linux.cyber-dyne.com
-.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.. . -.- .. --... .- -.-- -.- -.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Vodall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, April 23, 1999 10:14 PM
Subject: Re: This maybe a little off the subject, but...
>>
>> Kantronics 9612. 1200 baud packet is dead (nearly).
>> ____________
>>
>> 73's
>> Chas, W1CG
>> ____________
>
>
>Just to keep things here interesting.. Can anybody
>confirm that they are able to obtain decent results with
>the 9612 RECEIVING 9600 packet?
>
>By decent I mean doing 99 out of 100 256 byte packets. Even
>better would be 576 bytes or larger packets.
>
>If so, what's the secret?
>
>Some guru folks here with the right test equipment are finding
>the 9612 is only good for 80% or so - even when the input stream
>is a near perfect eye pattern. It appears that the demodulator
>stage/chip isn't holding lock all the time.
>
>The transmitted signal looks excellent.
>
>Bill - WA7NWP
>
