--
Subject: Re: sucess story! upgrade from RH4.2 -> RH6.0
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
>this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
>------_=_NextPart_000_01BEE7E7.1ED84D4A
>Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>This message uses a character set that is not supported by the Internet
>Service. To view the original message content, open the attached
>message. If the text doesn't display correctly, save the attachment to
>disk, and then open it using a viewer that can display the original
>character set. <<message.txt>>
>------_=_NextPart_000_01BEE7E7.1ED84D4A
>Content-Type: text/plain;
> name="message.txt"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>Content-Disposition: attachment;
> filename="message.txt"
>Received: from listserv.funet.fi ([128.214.248.27]) by mail.dialisdn.net with SMTP
>(Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2232.9)
> id Q9QXZSB2; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 08:58:59 -0400
>Received: from vger.rutgers.edu ([128.6.190.2]:32317 "EHLO vger.rutgers.edu") convert
>rfc822-to-quoted-printable-->route
> by listserv.funet.fi with ESMTP id <S19191AbPHPMu6>;
> Mon, 16 Aug 1999 15:50:58 +0300
>Received: by vger.rutgers.edu via listexpand id <S153867AbPHPMuO>;
> Mon, 16 Aug 1999 08:50:14 -0400
>Received: by vger.rutgers.edu id <S153945AbPHPMt4>;
> Mon, 16 Aug 1999 08:49:56 -0400
>Received: from dialup07.totacc.com ([204.134.127.137]:1569 "EHLO convert
>rfc822-to-8bit
> cannac.ampr.org") by vger.rutgers.edu with ESMTP id <S155075AbPHPMtk>;
> Mon, 16 Aug 1999 08:49:40 -0400
>Received: from localhost (k5di@localhost)
> by cannac.ampr.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA02730;
> Mon, 16 Aug 1999 06:51:04 -0600
>X-Authentication-Warning: cannac.ampr.org: k5di owned process doing -bs
>Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 06:51:03 -0600 (MDT)
>From: "Karl F. Larsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: "Thomas M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>cc: Linux-Hams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: sucess story! upgrade from RH4.2 -> RH6.0
>In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
>Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Precedence: bulk
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-hams-outgoing
> Netrom is broke Thomas. Use your old netromd in Red Hat 6 and it
>will work fine. If you use "listen" use a su - root xterm. Another
>problem...:-)
>On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Thomas M. wrote:
>> Hi
>>=20
>> I've just upgraded my whole setup from RH4.2, to RH6.0. Using the ne=
>w
>> libax25, ax25-tools etc.
>>=20
>> So far everything seems to run ok, except netrom ports. Somehow prog=
>rams
>> fail to see that the netrom devices are active...
>>=20
>> To get this far, I've had to patch a couple of files :
>>=20
>> in libax25 kernel_netrom.h is missing the definition of SOL_NETROM, =
>after
>> browsing some sources i found out that this should be 259, so I added=
> a
>> #define SOL_NETROM 259 to the file...
>>=20
>> in ax25_tools, the axctl program has an error, i removed the line ne=
>ar
>> the bottom of the file, saying ax25_ctl.digi_count, as digi_count doe=
>sn't
>> appear in the ax25_ctl struct...
>>=20
>> Is the above fixes ok?? Or have i messed up big time, by adding/dele=
>ting
>> something in those files?
>>=20
>>=20
>> In FBB i added a couple of defines for SOL_NETROM and SOL_AX25 to
>> drv_sock.c (i tried to include kernel_netrom.h and kernel_ax25.h, but=
> then
>> the compiler just barfs about a lot of redefines).
>>=20
>> So now the setup is :
>> RH6.0, kernel 2.2.11-ac3
>> xfbb 701a
>> libax25 v.0.0.6
>> ax25-tools 0.0.4
>> ax25-apps 0.0.3
>> clx 4.06
>>=20
>>=20
>> Thomas M=F8rch
>> licensed ham, with callsign OZ2AFO. License category: CEPT-1
>>=20
>> If God had intended man to smoke He would have set him on fire.
>>=20
>>=20
>Best wishes=20
> - Karl F. Larsen, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (505) 524-3303 -
>------_=_NextPart_000_01BEE7E7.1ED84D4A--
