On Mon, 27 Sep 1999, M Taylor wrote: > Now I would be interested to see if a secure (cryptographic) authenication > method would be acceptable - no data is encrypted just a secure > "handshake" to validate a remote operator's identity, perhaps using > public key digital signatures. When I considered it a couple of years ago, it seemed to me that a public-key authenticated ssh session would be OK under FCC regs, since the intent is not to obscure, and because the the "encrypted" portion can be decrypted using my public key, which anyone can have. Bob N2KGO
- Security for amateurradio TCP/IP server! Robert Schelander
- Re: Security for amateurradio TCP/IP server! Dave Gingrich
- Re: Security for amateurradio TCP/IP server! M Taylor
- Re: Security for amateurradio TCP/IP server! Bob Snyder
- Re: Security for amateurradio TCP/IP server! Carl Makin
- Re: Security for amateurradio TCP/IP server! Andrew Benham
- Re: Security for amateurradio TCP/IP ser... Dirk Koopman
- Re: Security for amateurradio TCP/IP... Samuel A. Falvo II
- Re: Security for amateurradio TCP/IP ser... M Taylor
- Re: Security for amateurradio TCP/IP... Samuel A. Falvo II
- Problems compiling ax25-utils-2.1.42... Jaime Robles
- Re: Problems compiling ax25-uti... Tomi Manninen OH2BNS
- Re: Problems compiling ax25... Dirk Koopman
- Re: Problems compiling ... Tomi Manninen OH2BNS
