> That's correct. I think a map of prefix->IOTA would be the most useful. > That same information could be included in the existing prefix table. Hmmm. Somebody on some oddball IOTA island could still have a perfectly ordinary callsign. You can't map prefix <-> IOTA, I think. Any award experts amongs us? Perhaps a separate table with known callsigns and IOTA numbers. Wilbert ZL2BSJ
- [logging] new schema from CTY.DAT Hamish Moffatt
- Re: [logging] new schema from CTY.DAT Ivo Simicevic
- Re: [logging] new schema from CTY.DAT Hamish Moffatt
- RE: [logging] new schema from CTY.DAT Wilbert Knol
- RE: [logging] new schema from CTY.DAT Dirk Koopman
- Re: [logging] new schema from CTY.DAT Wilbert Knol
- Re: [logging] new schema from CTY.DAT Hamish Moffatt
- Re: [logging] new schema from CTY.DAT Steve Dimse K4HG
- Re: [logging] new schema from CTY.DAT Hamish Moffatt
