On Wednesday, 9 July 2025 09:32:06 Central European Summer Time Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 07:09:46PM +0200, Duje Mihanović wrote: > > The current pinctrl properties apply only to the pxav1 controller. > > Why they are not applicable for pxav3?
state_cmd_gpio is used for working around a PXA168 SDIO erratum. That SoC uses the pxav1 controller and no such erratum exists on any of the other PXA SoCs. > > Adding one default pinctrl node to a pxav3 controller therefore causes > > a schema warning. > > > > Check the existing properties only on pxav1. pxav2 and pxav3 may add > > their own set of pinctrl properties if and when needed. > > This should be rather made complete here, because properties should be > defined in top-level, not in allOf: block. Strictly speaking pinctrl-xxx > are defined in core schema, but still the binding should follow same > rule - define them in top. Would it then be acceptable to declare the pinctrl properties in the top level and define each controller's respective description: and items: in the allOf: block? Regards, -- Duje
