On 16/01/2026 09:50, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>
> Because of the hybrid approach I'm arguing the ACPM child node does not
> fully describe the hardware, and it's just a firmware abstraction.
> So option 2/ would be to have just the TMU IP block described with a
> phandle to the ACPM IPC:
>
> soc: soc@0 {
> tmu@100a0000 {
> compatible = "google,gs101-tmu-top";
> reg = <0x100a0000 0x800>;
> clocks = <&cmu_misc CLK_GOUT_MISC_TMU_TOP_PCLK>;
> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 769 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
>
> /* The "Firmware Phandle" approach */
> samsung,acpm-ipc = <&acpm_ipc>;
>
> #thermal-sensor-cells = <1>;
Yes, this one, I think it's the best representation.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
